Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

A. C. Frost & Co. v. Coeur D'alene Mines Corp.

• 1940 • 312 U.S. 38 • Hughes Court
In the case of A. C. Frost & Co. v. Coeur D'Alene Mines Corp., 1940, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Coeur D’Alene Mines Corporation, reversing a previous decision by lower courts that had favored A.C Frost & Company. The dispute arose over mining properties in Idaho where both companies claimed ownership rights to certain veins or lodes of ore beneath the surface land owned by A.C Frost & Company but leased to Coeur D’Alene Mines Corporation for mining purposes under an agreement...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1940
Docket: 78
312 U.S. 38
61 S. Ct. 414
85 L. Ed. 500
1941 U.S. LEXIS 1271
Argued: Dec 18, 1940

A. C. Frost & Co. v. Coeur D'alene Mines Corp.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of A. C. Frost & Co. v. Coeur D'Alene Mines Corp., 1940, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Coeur D’Alene Mines Corporation, reversing a previous decision by lower courts that had favored A.C Frost & Company. The dispute arose over mining properties in Idaho where both companies claimed ownership rights to certain veins or lodes of ore beneath the surface land owned by A.C Frost & Company but leased to Coeur D’Alene Mines Corporation for mining purposes under an agreement dating back to 1921.The court held that according to federal law and local customs, subsurface mineral rights belong to whoever first locates them and complies with statutory requirements for perfecting their claim - regardless of who owns the surface land above it.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for A. C. Frost & Co. v. Coeur D'Alene Mines Corp., Justice Black disagreed with the majority's decision to uphold a lower court ruling that denied recovery of stock shares on grounds of fraud, due to an alleged failure by plaintiffs to prove they had relied upon false representations made by defendants in purchasing said stocks. He argued that this interpretation was too narrow and did not adequately consider established legal principles regarding fraudulent misrepresentation and deceit, which do not always require proof of reliance as a prerequisite for recovery in cases where material facts were concealed or misrepresented intentionally or recklessly by one party causing injury to another party who acted upon such concealment or misrepresentation unknowingly.

Opinion written by Justice JCMcReynolds
Decided: Jan 20, 1941
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms