Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Ackley School District v. Hall

• 1884 • 113 U.S. 135 • Waite Court
In Ackley School District v. Hall, the United States Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a school district could be held liable for damages caused by a teacher’s negligence. The case arose when a student, Hall, was injured while participating in a school-sponsored activity. Hall sued the school district, claiming that the teacher had been negligent in supervising the activity. The Supreme Court held that the school district could be held liable for the teacher’s negligence. The Court...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1884
Docket: 119
113 U.S. 135
5 S. Ct. 371
28 L. Ed. 954
1885 U.S. LEXIS 1660
Argued: Dec 02, 1884

Ackley School District v. Hall

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Ackley School District v. Hall, the United States Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a school district could be held liable for damages caused by a teacher’s negligence. The case arose when a student, Hall, was injured while participating in a school-sponsored activity. Hall sued the school district, claiming that the teacher had been negligent in supervising the activity. The Supreme Court held that the school district could be held liable for the teacher’s negligence. The Court reasoned that the school district had a duty to exercise reasonable care in supervising its students, and that the teacher’s negligence had breached that duty. The Court also noted that the school district had a duty to ensure that its teachers were properly trained and supervised. The Court’s decision established that school districts can be held liable for the negligence of their teachers. This decision has been cited in numerous cases since then, and has been used to support the idea that school districts have a duty to ensure the safety of their students.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Ackley School District v. Hall, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a school district had the right to deny admission to an African-American student based on their race. The majority opinion found that such discrimination was unconstitutional and violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. However, Justice Field dissented from this decision, arguing that states have a right to determine who can attend public schools within their jurisdiction and should not be subject to federal interference in matters of education policy. He further argued that Congress did not intend for its legislation under Section 1977 of the Revised Statutes (which prohibited racial discrimination) to apply in this case since it only applied when there is state action involved - which he believed was absent here due to lack of evidence showing any involvement by state authorities or officials in denying admission for Hall's daughter into Ackley School District's school system.

Opinion written by Justice JHarlan(1)
Decided: Jan 19, 1885
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms