Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Adams v. Nashville

• 1877 • 95 U.S. 19 • Waite Court
Adams v. Nashville is a United States Supreme Court case that was decided in 1878. The case involved a dispute between the City of Nashville and the Adams Express Company. The City of Nashville had passed an ordinance that required all express companies to pay a fee for the privilege of doing business in the city. The Adams Express Company refused to pay the fee, arguing that it was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court agreed with the Adams Express Company, ruling that the ordinance was...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1877
Docket: 46
95 U.S. 19
24 L. Ed. 369
1877 U.S. LEXIS 2127

Adams v. Nashville

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Adams v. Nashville is a United States Supreme Court case that was decided in 1878. The case involved a dispute between the City of Nashville and the Adams Express Company. The City of Nashville had passed an ordinance that required all express companies to pay a fee for the privilege of doing business in the city. The Adams Express Company refused to pay the fee, arguing that it was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court agreed with the Adams Express Company, ruling that the ordinance was unconstitutional. The Court held that the ordinance was an unconstitutional exercise of the City of Nashville's police power. The Court reasoned that the ordinance was an unreasonable and arbitrary interference with the right of the Adams Express Company to do business in the city. The Court also held that the ordinance was an unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce. The decision in Adams v. Nashville established the principle that a state or local government cannot impose an unreasonable or arbitrary burden on interstate commerce. This principle has been applied in numerous cases since then, and it remains an important part of the law today.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Adams v. Nashville, the United States Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a city ordinance that required African Americans to pay an annual tax for the privilege of living within its limits violated the Thirteenth Amendment. The majority opinion held that it did not violate this amendment because it was merely a regulation and not slavery or involuntary servitude in any form. Justice Field dissented from this decision, arguing that although there may be some regulations which are permissible under the Thirteenth Amendment, such as those related to public health and safety, they must still be reasonable and non-discriminatory in order to pass constitutional muster. In his view, this particular ordinance failed on both counts since it imposed an unequal burden on African Americans without providing them with any benefit whatsoever; thus making it unconstitutional under the Thirteenth Amendment's prohibition against slavery or involuntary servitude in any form.

Opinion written by Justice WHunt
Decided: Nov 05, 1877
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms