Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Aguilar Et Al. v. Felton Et Al.

• 1984 • 473 U.S. 402 • Burger Court
In the case of Aguilar et al. v. Felton et al., 1984, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that public funding for remedial education services to disadvantaged children in religious schools violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The New York City Board of Education had used federal funds under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to pay salaries for public employees who taught in parochial schools. The court held that this arrangement resulted in an excessive...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1984
Docket: 84-237
473 U.S. 402
105 S. Ct. 3232
87 L. Ed. 2d 290
1985 U.S. LEXIS 117
Argued: Dec 05, 1984

Aguilar Et Al. v. Felton Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Aguilar et al. v. Felton et al., 1984, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that public funding for remedial education services to disadvantaged children in religious schools violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The New York City Board of Education had used federal funds under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to pay salaries for public employees who taught in parochial schools. The court held that this arrangement resulted in an excessive entanglement between church and state because it required extensive government monitoring to ensure teachers did not include religious content in their instruction, thus violating constitutional principles separating church and state.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Aguilar v. Felton, Justice White argued that the majority's decision was inconsistent with previous rulings and unnecessarily broadened the interpretation of the Establishment Clause. He contended that there was no evidence to suggest that public school teachers would promote their religious beliefs while teaching in parochial schools under Title I of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). Furthermore, he believed this ruling could potentially invalidate other federal programs providing aid to students attending religious institutions. The dissent also pointed out that monitoring by public authorities did not equate to excessive entanglement between church and state but rather ensured compliance with ESEA requirements. Thus, according to Justice White, such oversight should not be considered a violation of First Amendment rights as it served a secular purpose without advancing or inhibiting religion.

Opinion written by Justice WJBrennan
Decided: Jul 01, 1985
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms