Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Albertson Et Al. v. Millard, Attorney General Of Michigan, Et Al.

• 1952 • 345 U.S. 242 • Vinson Court
In the case of Albertson et al. v. Millard, Attorney General of Michigan, et al., 1952, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Albertson and his fellow petitioners who were members of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA). The state law required them to register as members of a subversive organization but they refused on grounds that it violated their Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination. The court held that compelling individuals to disclose their membership in an organization deemed...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Vinson Court
Term: 1952
Docket: 384
345 U.S. 242
73 S. Ct. 600
97 L. Ed. 2d 983
1953 U.S. LEXIS 2302
Argued: Feb 02, 1953

Albertson Et Al. v. Millard, Attorney General Of Michigan, Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Albertson et al. v. Millard, Attorney General of Michigan, et al., 1952, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Albertson and his fellow petitioners who were members of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA). The state law required them to register as members of a subversive organization but they refused on grounds that it violated their Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination. The court held that compelling individuals to disclose their membership in an organization deemed by government as subversive was indeed unconstitutional because it could potentially lead to criminal prosecution thus infringing upon their right against self-incincrimination under the Fifth Amendment.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Albertson et al. v. Millard, Attorney General of Michigan, et al., 1952 is not readily available online or in public records. As such, it's impossible to provide a summary for this specific request without access to the full text of the court proceedings and decisions made by each justice involved in this particular case.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: Mar 16, 1953
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms