Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Abdus-shahid M. S. Ali v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons Et Al

• 2007 • 552 U.S. 214 • Roberts Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Abdus-Shahid M. S. Ali v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al, 2007 revolved around the interpretation of a federal statute regarding lawsuits against government agencies and officials for lost property by prisoners in custody. The plaintiff, Abdus-Shahid M.S Ali, an inmate at a federal prison filed suit under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) alleging that his personal property was lost or damaged during a transfer between prisons and sought compensation from the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Roberts Court
Term: 2007
Docket: 06-9130
552 U.S. 214
128 S. Ct. 831
169 L. Ed. 2d 680
2008 U.S. LEXIS 1212
Argued: Oct 29, 2007

Abdus-shahid M. S. Ali v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons Et Al

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Abdus-Shahid M. S. Ali v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al, 2007 revolved around the interpretation of a federal statute regarding lawsuits against government agencies and officials for lost property by prisoners in custody. The plaintiff, Abdus-Shahid M.S Ali, an inmate at a federal prison filed suit under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) alleging that his personal property was lost or damaged during a transfer between prisons and sought compensation from the Federal Bureau of Prisons (FBOP). The FBOP argued it was immune to such claims under an exception in FTCA which exempts "any officer of customs or excise or any other law enforcement officer" from liability for detention-related damages to goods/property. In this case, the Supreme Court had to determine whether this exemption applied only to officers enforcing customs/excise laws as claimed by Ali or if it extended broadly across all law enforcement officers including those working within prisons as asserted by FBOP. Ultimately, with Justice Thomas delivering its opinion on January 22nd 2008; the court ruled unanimously in favor of FBOP interpreting that Congress intended broad immunity for all law enforcement officers not just those involved with customs/excise duties thus dismissing Mr.Ali's claim.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Abdus-Shahid M.S. Ali v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, Justice Breyer argued that the majority's interpretation of the law was too narrow and failed to consider its broader implications. He contended that Congress intended for federal agencies to be held accountable for their actions, including those involving negligence or wrongful acts by employees resulting in loss of property. According to him, excluding certain agencies from this accountability contradicts legislative intent and undermines public trust in government institutions. Furthermore, he pointed out potential inconsistencies arising from such a narrow reading; some prisoners could recover damages while others couldn't based on which agency runs their prison facility - an outcome unlikely intended by lawmakers when drafting this statute.

Opinion written by Justice CThomas
Decided: Jan 22, 2008
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms