Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Allgeyer v. Louisiana

• 1896 • 165 U.S. 578 • Fuller Court
In Allgeyer v. Louisiana, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Allgeyer & Co., a New Orleans-based cotton firm that had violated a Louisiana law prohibiting out-of-state insurance contracts not approved by state officials. The court held that the 14th Amendment's Due Process Clause protected an individual’s liberty to enter into contracts without unreasonable interference from the government, thus establishing what is known as "substantive due process." This was one of the first cases where...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1896
Docket: 446
165 U.S. 578
17 S. Ct. 427
41 L. Ed. 832
1897 U.S. LEXIS 1998

Allgeyer v. Louisiana

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Allgeyer v. Louisiana, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Allgeyer & Co., a New Orleans-based cotton firm that had violated a Louisiana law prohibiting out-of-state insurance contracts not approved by state officials. The court held that the 14th Amendment's Due Process Clause protected an individual’s liberty to enter into contracts without unreasonable interference from the government, thus establishing what is known as "substantive due process." This was one of the first cases where substantive due process was used to strike down a state statute and it set precedent for future rulings on economic regulation and personal liberties under this doctrine.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the Allgeyer v. Louisiana case was not recorded or does not exist. The Supreme Court decision, which ruled 6-2 in favor of Allgeyer, did not include a published dissent from the two justices who voted against it. Therefore, there is no available summary for a dissenting opinion for this particular case.

Opinion written by Justice RWPeckham
Decided: Mar 01, 1897
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms