Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Allied Stores Of Ohio, Inc., v. Bowers, Tax Commissioner Of Ohio

• 1958 • 358 U.S. 522 • Warren Court
In the case of Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. Bowers, Tax Commissioner of Ohio in 1958, the U.S Supreme Court ruled on a dispute regarding state taxation policy. The issue at hand was whether or not it was constitutional for the State of Ohio to impose an ad valorem personal property tax on inventory held within the state by a non-resident corporation for sale and delivery outside the state. Allied Stores argued that this practice violated both Due Process Clause and Commerce Clause rights...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1958
Docket: 10
358 U.S. 522
79 S. Ct. 437
3 L. Ed. 2d 480
1959 U.S. LEXIS 1773
Argued: Nov 12, 1958

Allied Stores Of Ohio, Inc., v. Bowers, Tax Commissioner Of Ohio

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. Bowers, Tax Commissioner of Ohio in 1958, the U.S Supreme Court ruled on a dispute regarding state taxation policy. The issue at hand was whether or not it was constitutional for the State of Ohio to impose an ad valorem personal property tax on inventory held within the state by a non-resident corporation for sale and delivery outside the state. Allied Stores argued that this practice violated both Due Process Clause and Commerce Clause rights under federal law as it amounted to extraterritorial taxation. The court upheld Ohio's right to levy such taxes with Justice Brennan delivering majority opinion stating that there is no violation in taxing goods destined for out-of-state shipment while they are still physically located within its borders because ownership remains vested in owner who retains control over them until their actual shipment.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc., v. Bowers, Tax Commissioner of Ohio, Justice Brennan argued that the tax imposed by Ohio on out-of-state corporations was unconstitutional. He contended that it violated both the Due Process and Commerce Clauses of the Constitution because it discriminated against interstate commerce. The tax was levied based on gross receipts from sales made in other states but delivered to customers in Ohio; however, no such tax applied to similar transactions conducted entirely within state borders. This discrepancy created an unfair burden on interstate businesses which were taxed more heavily than their intrastate counterparts solely due to their participation in interstate commerce - a clear violation according to Justice Brennan's interpretation of constitutional law.

Opinion written by Justice CEWhittaker
Decided: Feb 24, 1959
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms