Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Alpha Steamship Corporation Et Al. v. Cain

• 1929 • 281 U.S. 642 • Hughes Court
The Alpha Steamship Corporation v. Cain case in 1929 revolved around a dispute over the payment of wages to a seaman who had been discharged from his duties before the end of his contract term due to an injury sustained while on duty. The plaintiff, Cain, argued that he was entitled to receive wages for the entire duration of his employment contract despite being unable to work after getting injured. On the other hand, Alpha Steamship Corporation contended that they were only obligated to pay...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1929
Docket: 457
281 U.S. 642
50 S. Ct. 443
74 L. Ed. 1086
1930 U.S. LEXIS 723
Argued: Apr 29, 1930

Alpha Steamship Corporation Et Al. v. Cain

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Alpha Steamship Corporation v. Cain case in 1929 revolved around a dispute over the payment of wages to a seaman who had been discharged from his duties before the end of his contract term due to an injury sustained while on duty. The plaintiff, Cain, argued that he was entitled to receive wages for the entire duration of his employment contract despite being unable to work after getting injured. On the other hand, Alpha Steamship Corporation contended that they were only obligated to pay him until he reached a port where medical treatment could be provided and not beyond this point as per maritime law provisions. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Cain stating that under Section 4529 Revised Statutes (46 USCA §596), if any sailor is discharged at any place short of their intended destination due to sickness or injury incurred during service without fraudulence on their part, they are entitled full wages for the period stated in their agreement. This decision clarified wage rights for seamen when prematurely discharged because of injuries sustained during service.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for ALPHA STEAMSHIP CORPORATION et al. v. CAIN, it was argued that the majority's decision to hold a shipowner liable for injuries sustained by seamen due to negligence of fellow servants contradicts established maritime law principles and previous court rulings. The dissent emphasized that under general maritime law, a shipowner is not responsible for accidents caused by one servant to another unless there has been some fault or neglect on his part in selecting competent officers and crew members. They also pointed out inconsistencies between this ruling and earlier cases where similar circumstances were presented but resulted in different outcomes. Furthermore, they expressed concern about the potential implications of this decision on future cases involving personal injury claims against employers under federal workers' compensation laws.

Opinion written by Justice PButler
Decided: May 26, 1930
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms