Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Alstate Construction Co. v. Durkin, Secretary Of Labor

• 1952 • 345 U.S. 13 • Vinson Court
In the case of Alstate Construction Co. v. Durkin, Secretary of Labor in 1952, the Supreme Court ruled on a dispute between a construction company and the Department of Labor regarding wage rates for workers under federal contracts. The issue arose when Alstate Construction Company was contracted to build housing units at an Air Force base but failed to pay their employees according to predetermined minimum wages set by the Secretary of Labor as required by law (the Davis-Bacon Act). When this...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Vinson Court
Term: 1952
Docket: 296
345 U.S. 13
73 S. Ct. 565
97 L. Ed. 2d 745
1953 U.S. LEXIS 2615
Argued: Feb 02, 1953

Alstate Construction Co. v. Durkin, Secretary Of Labor

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Alstate Construction Co. v. Durkin, Secretary of Labor in 1952, the Supreme Court ruled on a dispute between a construction company and the Department of Labor regarding wage rates for workers under federal contracts. The issue arose when Alstate Construction Company was contracted to build housing units at an Air Force base but failed to pay their employees according to predetermined minimum wages set by the Secretary of Labor as required by law (the Davis-Bacon Act). When this violation was discovered, funds were withheld from payments due to Alstate until they complied with these requirements. In response, Alstate sued arguing that such withholding violated their rights under Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause and contended that they should have been given notice and opportunity for hearing before any action was taken against them. The Supreme Court disagreed with Alstate’s argument stating that there is no requirement for prior notice or hearing before taking administrative action like withholding contract payments in order to enforce compliance with statutory obligations related to wage rates under federal contracts.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Allstate Construction Co. v. Durkin, it was argued that the Secretary of Labor did not have jurisdiction over a dispute between an employer and its employees regarding wage rates under the Davis-Bacon Act. The dissenting justices believed that this law only gave authority to determine prevailing wages in localities where federal construction projects were taking place, but not to resolve disputes about what those wages should be on specific contracts. They contended that such matters should be left up to negotiation between employers and workers or their representatives, rather than being dictated by government officials who may lack sufficient knowledge of industry conditions and standards. Furthermore, they expressed concern about potential abuse of power if administrative agencies were allowed unchecked discretion in interpreting laws and regulations.

Opinion written by Justice HLBlack
Decided: Mar 09, 1953
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms