Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

American Express Company v. Michigan

• 1899 • 177 U.S. 404 • Fuller Court
In the 1899 case American Express Company v. Michigan, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in favor of American Express. The state of Michigan had imposed a tax on all corporations doing business within its borders, and this included out-of-state companies like American Express that were conducting operations in Michigan. The company challenged this taxation as unconstitutional under both the Due Process Clause and Commerce Clause of the U.S Constitution. In their decision, however,...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1899
Docket: 220
177 U.S. 404
20 S. Ct. 695
44 L. Ed. 823
1900 U.S. LEXIS 1809
Argued: Nov 09, 1899

American Express Company v. Michigan

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1899 case American Express Company v. Michigan, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in favor of American Express. The state of Michigan had imposed a tax on all corporations doing business within its borders, and this included out-of-state companies like American Express that were conducting operations in Michigan. The company challenged this taxation as unconstitutional under both the Due Process Clause and Commerce Clause of the U.S Constitution. In their decision, however, justices held that while states cannot interfere with interstate commerce directly through regulation or taxation (as per Commerce clause), they can impose taxes on activities conducted within their jurisdiction if those activities are sufficiently separate from interstate commerce itself - which was found to be true for certain aspects of American Express's operations in Michigan.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of American Express Company v. Michigan argued that the state tax imposed on express companies was unconstitutional because it violated the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The justice contended that this tax, which was based on gross receipts from interstate commerce, directly burdened interstate commerce and therefore infringed upon federal jurisdiction. He further maintained that such a tax could potentially lead to multiple taxation by different states on the same entity or transaction, thereby creating an undue burden on interstate commerce. This view held that only Congress has authority over regulating and taxing interstate trade under its constitutional power to regulate commerce among several states.

Opinion written by Justice EDEWhite
Decided: Apr 16, 1800
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms