Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

American Motors Corp. Et Al. v. City Of Kenosha

• 1957 • 356 U.S. 21 • Warren Court
In the 1957 case of American Motors Corp. et al. v. City of Kenosha, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of American Motors Corporation (AMC). The dispute arose when AMC was assessed for property taxes by the city of Kenosha, Wisconsin on its inventory that was stored in transit at a public warehouse within city limits but destined for out-of-state locations. AMC argued that this taxation violated their rights under both the Commerce Clause and Due Process Clause as it interfered with...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1957
Docket: 343
356 U.S. 21
78 S. Ct. 559
2 L. Ed. 2d 578
1958 U.S. LEXIS 1381

American Motors Corp. Et Al. v. City Of Kenosha

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1957 case of American Motors Corp. et al. v. City of Kenosha, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of American Motors Corporation (AMC). The dispute arose when AMC was assessed for property taxes by the city of Kenosha, Wisconsin on its inventory that was stored in transit at a public warehouse within city limits but destined for out-of-state locations. AMC argued that this taxation violated their rights under both the Commerce Clause and Due Process Clause as it interfered with interstate commerce and lacked jurisdictional basis respectively. The court agreed with AMC's argument stating that goods which are merely passing through or temporarily located within a state cannot be subjected to local taxation because they are part of interstate commerce.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for American Motors Corp. et al. v. City of Kenosha, it was argued that the majority's decision to uphold a Wisconsin law imposing property taxes on machinery and equipment used in manufacturing was incorrect because it violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The dissent contended that this tax burdened interstate commerce disproportionately, as it only applied to manufacturers who produced goods for sale outside Wisconsin while exempting those who sold within state lines. This selective taxation created an unfair advantage for local businesses over out-of-state competitors, which contradicted principles of fair competition and equal protection under federal law. Furthermore, they believed that such discriminatory treatment could potentially lead to economic retaliation from other states against Wisconsin-based companies - a situation contrary to national unity and free trade among states.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: Mar 10, 1958
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms