Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

American Tobacco Company v. Werckmeister

• 1907 • 207 U.S. 284 • Fuller Court
In the case of American Tobacco Company v. Werckmeister, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of American Tobacco Company, stating that a copyright owner cannot seize imported copies of their work without first giving notice to the importer and an opportunity for them to be heard in court. The dispute arose when Richard Werckmeister, who held copyrights on certain pictures used on cigarette packages, attempted to have shipments belonging to American Tobacco seized at customs due to alleged...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1907
Docket: 28
207 U.S. 284
28 S. Ct. 72
52 L. Ed. 208
1907 U.S. LEXIS 1224
Argued: Oct 30, 1907

American Tobacco Company v. Werckmeister

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of American Tobacco Company v. Werckmeister, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of American Tobacco Company, stating that a copyright owner cannot seize imported copies of their work without first giving notice to the importer and an opportunity for them to be heard in court. The dispute arose when Richard Werckmeister, who held copyrights on certain pictures used on cigarette packages, attempted to have shipments belonging to American Tobacco seized at customs due to alleged copyright infringement. However, he did not provide prior notice or allow for a hearing before seizure as required by law under section 4965 of Revised Statutes (now 17 USC §106). Therefore, his actions were deemed unconstitutional as they violated due process rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of American Tobacco Company v. Werckmeister was not recorded or does not exist. The Supreme Court's decision, delivered by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., was unanimous with no noted dissents. Therefore, a summary of a dissenting opinion for this particular case cannot be provided as it is non-existent in the court records.

Opinion written by Justice WRDay
Decided: Dec 02, 1907
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms