Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Anderson Et Al. v. Celebrezze, Secretary Of State Of Ohio

• 1982 • 460 U.S. 780 • Burger Court
In the 1982 case Anderson et al. v. Celebrezze, Secretary of State of Ohio, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of independent presidential candidate John B. Anderson who had challenged an Ohio law that required independent candidates to file their candidacy papers by March - seven months before the general election and three months before major party candidates were chosen at national conventions. The court held that this early filing deadline violated Anderson's rights under the First and...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1982
Docket: 81-1635
460 U.S. 780
103 S. Ct. 1564
75 L. Ed. 2d 547
1983 U.S. LEXIS 145
Argued: Dec 06, 1982

Anderson Et Al. v. Celebrezze, Secretary Of State Of Ohio

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1982 case Anderson et al. v. Celebrezze, Secretary of State of Ohio, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of independent presidential candidate John B. Anderson who had challenged an Ohio law that required independent candidates to file their candidacy papers by March - seven months before the general election and three months before major party candidates were chosen at national conventions. The court held that this early filing deadline violated Anderson's rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments as it placed an unconstitutional burden on his campaign by limiting his ability to build support among voters who might prefer him over a major party nominee selected later in the year.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Anderson et al. v. Celebrezze, Justice Blackmun argued that Ohio's early filing deadline was not unconstitutional and did not violate any fundamental rights of presidential candidate John B. Anderson or his supporters. He emphasized that states have a legitimate interest in setting reasonable deadlines to ensure orderly election processes and to avoid voter confusion caused by last-minute changes in candidates on the ballot paper. Furthermore, he pointed out that Anderson had ample time to comply with Ohio's requirements but chose not to do so until it was too late, suggesting this case is more about an individual failing to meet established rules rather than those rules being inherently unfair or discriminatory.

Opinion written by Justice JPStevens
Decided: Apr 19, 1983
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms