Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Andrews, Administratrix Of Andrews, v. Virginian Railway Company

• 1918 • 248 U.S. 272 • White Court
In the 1918 case of Andrews, Administratrix of Andrews v. Virginian Railway Company, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the railway company. The plaintiff was suing on behalf of her deceased husband who had been killed while working for the defendant as a brakeman when he fell from a moving train and died instantly due to injuries sustained from his fall. The plaintiff alleged that her husband's death was caused by negligence on part of his employer - failure to provide safe equipment and...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1918
Docket: 82
248 U.S. 272
39 S. Ct. 101
63 L. Ed. 236
1919 U.S. LEXIS 2307
Argued: Dec 16, 1918

Andrews, Administratrix Of Andrews, v. Virginian Railway Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1918 case of Andrews, Administratrix of Andrews v. Virginian Railway Company, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the railway company. The plaintiff was suing on behalf of her deceased husband who had been killed while working for the defendant as a brakeman when he fell from a moving train and died instantly due to injuries sustained from his fall. The plaintiff alleged that her husband's death was caused by negligence on part of his employer - failure to provide safe equipment and violation of federal safety laws regarding railroad employees' work hours. However, there were no witnesses or substantial evidence supporting these claims except for an unexplained accident report stating that Mr.Andrews had fallen off a car ladder which could have resulted from any number reasons including personal carelessness or misstep.The court held that mere conjecture or speculation is not sufficient basis for liability; it must be proven with reasonable certainty through factual evidence that negligence occurred causing injury/death.Therefore,the judgement favored Virginian Railway Company since Mrs.Andrews failed to prove their direct responsibility towards her husband's fatal accident.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Andrews v. Virginian Railway Company, Justice Holmes argued that the railway company should not be held liable for Mr. Andrew's death because it was not a direct result of their negligence. He contended that while the company may have been negligent in maintaining its equipment, this did not directly cause Mr. Andrews to fall from his car and subsequently get run over by another train on an adjacent track - these were separate incidents with different causes and consequences. According to him, there was no clear causal link between the railway's alleged negligence and Mr. Andrew's unfortunate demise; thus holding them responsible would set a dangerous precedent where companies could be held accountable for any harm suffered by their employees or customers even if they had little or no control over those circumstances.

Opinion written by Justice EDEWhite
Decided: Jan 07, 1919
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms