Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Asylum v. New Orleans

• 1881 • 105 U.S. 362 • Waite Court
In Asylum v. New Orleans, the United States Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a city could impose a tax on a charitable organization. The case involved the Asylum of the Sisters of the Holy Family, a charitable organization that provided care for the elderly and the poor in New Orleans. The city had imposed a tax on the Asylum, which the Asylum argued was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court held that the tax was unconstitutional. The Court reasoned that the tax was a violation of the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1881
Docket: 218
105 U.S. 362
26 L. Ed. 1128
1881 U.S. LEXIS 2134

Asylum v. New Orleans

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Asylum v. New Orleans, the United States Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a city could impose a tax on a charitable organization. The case involved the Asylum of the Sisters of the Holy Family, a charitable organization that provided care for the elderly and the poor in New Orleans. The city had imposed a tax on the Asylum, which the Asylum argued was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court held that the tax was unconstitutional. The Court reasoned that the tax was a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, which prohibits states from denying any person the equal protection of the laws. The Court found that the tax was discriminatory because it was imposed on the Asylum, but not on other charitable organizations. The Court also found that the tax was not necessary to raise revenue for the city, and that it was an unreasonable burden on the Asylum. The Court concluded that the tax was unconstitutional and that the Asylum was entitled to an exemption from the tax. The Court's decision established that charitable organizations are entitled to the same protections as other citizens under the Equal Protection Clause.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Asylum v. New Orleans, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a city could tax property owned by a church that had been incorporated in another state. The majority opinion held that such taxation was unconstitutional because it violated the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV of the Constitution. However, Justice Field dissented from this decision on two grounds: first, he argued that there was no evidence to suggest that Congress intended for churches to be exempt from taxation; second, he asserted that even if they were so exempted, it would be up to each individual state legislature to decide how much or little tax should be levied against them. He concluded his dissent by noting that while states may not interfere with interstate commerce or impose discriminatory taxes on out-of-state entities as prohibited under Article IV's Commerce Clause, they are still free to levy taxes upon any property within their jurisdiction regardless of its ownership status.

Opinion written by Justice JPBradley
Decided: Apr 24, 1882
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms