Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Atchison Board Of Education v. De Kay

• 1892 • 148 U.S. 591 • Fuller Court
In the case of Atchison Board of Education v. De Kay in 1892, the U.S Supreme Court ruled on a dispute over school district boundaries and taxation. The plaintiff, Atchison Board of Education, argued that it was unjustly taxed by defendant De Kay for property located outside its jurisdictional limits. The court held that while state law allowed for taxes to be levied within a school district's geographical boundary, this did not extend to areas annexed after the tax had been imposed unless...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1892
Docket: 176
148 U.S. 591
13 S. Ct. 706
37 L. Ed. 573
1893 U.S. LEXIS 2256
Argued: Mar 24, 1893

Atchison Board Of Education v. De Kay

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Atchison Board of Education v. De Kay in 1892, the U.S Supreme Court ruled on a dispute over school district boundaries and taxation. The plaintiff, Atchison Board of Education, argued that it was unjustly taxed by defendant De Kay for property located outside its jurisdictional limits. The court held that while state law allowed for taxes to be levied within a school district's geographical boundary, this did not extend to areas annexed after the tax had been imposed unless explicitly stated by legislation. Therefore, since no such provision existed at the time when these lands were added to Atchison’s territory (and thus became subject to its taxing authority), they could not retroactively apply their levy onto them without violating due process rights under Fourteenth Amendment protections against arbitrary deprivation of property without legal justification or fair procedure.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Atchison Board of Education v. De Kay, it was argued that the decision to allow a school board to segregate students based on race contradicted the principles of equality enshrined in both state and federal law. The dissenting justices contended that segregation inherently implied inferiority and thus violated rights guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. They also pointed out inconsistencies in applying this principle only to schools, arguing if racial separation were truly justifiable, it should apply across all public institutions - which was not being done. Furthermore, they expressed concern over potential misuse of such power by local authorities leading to further discrimination against minority groups.

Opinion written by Justice DJBrewer
Decided: Apr 10, 1893
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms