Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Atlantic City Railroad Company v. Parker

• 1916 • 242 U.S. 56 • White Court
In the 1916 case of Atlantic City Railroad Company v. Parker, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Parker, a railroad employee who was injured on the job and sought compensation from his employer. The court held that under New Jersey's Workmen's Compensation Act, an employee could recover damages for injuries sustained during employment without proving negligence on part of their employer. This ruling upheld the constitutionality of workers' compensation laws which provided benefits to...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1916
Docket: 111
242 U.S. 56
37 S. Ct. 69
61 L. Ed. 150
1916 U.S. LEXIS 1529
Argued: Nov 16, 1916

Atlantic City Railroad Company v. Parker

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1916 case of Atlantic City Railroad Company v. Parker, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Parker, a railroad employee who was injured on the job and sought compensation from his employer. The court held that under New Jersey's Workmen's Compensation Act, an employee could recover damages for injuries sustained during employment without proving negligence on part of their employer. This ruling upheld the constitutionality of workers' compensation laws which provided benefits to employees hurt at work regardless of fault. It also affirmed that states have power to regulate businesses within their jurisdiction for welfare purposes even if it may affect interstate commerce indirectly.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Atlantic City Railroad Company v. Parker, it was argued that the plaintiff should not be awarded damages because he willingly assumed risk when he chose to ride on a platform of a train car rather than inside where seats were available. The justice contended that there was no evidence presented showing negligence by the railroad company and thus, they should not be held liable for injuries sustained in such circumstances. Furthermore, it was pointed out that if passengers are allowed to recover damages under these conditions, then railroads would essentially become insurers of passenger safety even when those passengers disregard their own personal safety by choosing risky behavior like riding on platforms instead of using provided seating within cars. This could potentially lead to an increase in reckless behavior among passengers as they would have no incentive to act responsibly while traveling on trains.

Opinion written by Justice OWHolmes
Decided: Dec 04, 1916
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms