Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Glenn

• 1915 • 239 U.S. 388 • White Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Glenn in 1915 revolved around a dispute over the liability of a railroad company for injuries sustained by an employee while on duty. The plaintiff, Glenn, was injured when he fell from a moving train operated by the defendant, Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company. He alleged that his fall was due to negligence on part of the company as they failed to provide safe equipment and working conditions. The court ruled in favor of...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1915
Docket: 91
239 U.S. 388
36 S. Ct. 154
60 L. Ed. 344
1915 U.S. LEXIS 1429
Argued: Dec 06, 1915

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Glenn

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Glenn in 1915 revolved around a dispute over the liability of a railroad company for injuries sustained by an employee while on duty. The plaintiff, Glenn, was injured when he fell from a moving train operated by the defendant, Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company. He alleged that his fall was due to negligence on part of the company as they failed to provide safe equipment and working conditions. The court ruled in favor of Glenn stating that under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA), employers are liable for injuries suffered by their employees due to their negligence or failure to ensure safety at work. This ruling established precedence for holding companies accountable for ensuring workplace safety and reinforced FELA's purpose which is protecting workers from hazardous employment conditions.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Glenn, it was argued that the plaintiff should not be allowed to recover damages because he had willingly assumed a risk associated with his employment. The justice contended that when an employee voluntarily accepts a job knowing its inherent dangers and risks, they cannot later sue their employer for injuries sustained from those known hazards. In this case, the plaintiff was aware of the dangerous condition of the railroad track but continued working without complaint or request for repair. Therefore, according to this view, he implicitly accepted these conditions as part of his employment and thus assumed any resulting risks - including injury.

Opinion written by Justice EDEWhite
Decided: Dec 20, 1915
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms