Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Wharton Et Al., Railroad Commissioners Of The State Of South Carolina

• 1907 • 207 U.S. 328 • Fuller Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Wharton et al., 1907, revolved around a dispute between the railroad company and South Carolina's state railroad commissioners over freight rates for intrastate commerce. The commission had set certain rates that the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company argued were so low as to be confiscatory, violating their rights under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution which prohibits states from depriving any person or...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1907
Docket: 36
207 U.S. 328
28 S. Ct. 121
52 L. Ed. 230
1907 U.S. LEXIS 1227
Argued: Nov 05, 1907

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Wharton Et Al., Railroad Commissioners Of The State Of South Carolina

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Wharton et al., 1907, revolved around a dispute between the railroad company and South Carolina's state railroad commissioners over freight rates for intrastate commerce. The commission had set certain rates that the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company argued were so low as to be confiscatory, violating their rights under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution which prohibits states from depriving any person or corporation of property without due process of law. The court ruled in favor of the railroad company, stating that while states have power to regulate commerce within their borders, they cannot use this power to enforce regulations that are unjustly discriminatory or result in confiscation. This decision affirmed corporations' constitutional protections against unfair regulation by state governments.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Wharton et al., argued that the majority's decision to uphold South Carolina's railroad regulation was an overreach of state power and a violation of interstate commerce laws. The dissenters believed that while states have the right to regulate businesses within their borders, they should not be able to impose regulations on companies operating across multiple states as it interferes with federal authority over interstate commerce. They also expressed concerns about potential economic consequences if each state were allowed to set its own rules for railroads, which could lead to inconsistent standards and hinder efficient operation of national transportation networks. Furthermore, they disagreed with the majority’s interpretation of “just compensation,” arguing that it should include profits lost due to regulatory restrictions rather than just direct costs incurred by complying with them.

Opinion written by Justice RWPeckham
Decided: Dec 09, 1907
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms