Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Ayrshire Collieries Corp. Et Al. v. United States Et Al.

• 1946 • 331 U.S. 132 • Vinson Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Ayrshire Collieries Corp. et al. v. United States et al., 1946, involved a dispute over the Interstate Commerce Commission's (ICC) authority to regulate private carriage by rail of commodities owned by the carrier itself or its affiliates for their own use and not for sale to others, known as "private carriage." The plaintiffs were coal companies who argued that such regulation exceeded the ICC's statutory powers under the Interstate Commerce Act and violated their...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Vinson Court
Term: 1946
Docket: 467
331 U.S. 132
67 S. Ct. 1168
91 L. Ed. 1391
1947 U.S. LEXIS 2899
Argued: Apr 07, 1947

Ayrshire Collieries Corp. Et Al. v. United States Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Ayrshire Collieries Corp. et al. v. United States et al., 1946, involved a dispute over the Interstate Commerce Commission's (ICC) authority to regulate private carriage by rail of commodities owned by the carrier itself or its affiliates for their own use and not for sale to others, known as "private carriage." The plaintiffs were coal companies who argued that such regulation exceeded the ICC's statutory powers under the Interstate Commerce Act and violated their constitutional rights under the Fifth Amendment due to deprivation of property without due process of law and denial of equal protection under laws. However, in a unanimous decision authored by Justice Harold Burton, it was held that Congress had intended for all forms of interstate transportation by rail carriers engaged in commerce among states be regulated uniformly regardless if they are public or private carriages; thus affirming ICC’s regulatory power over private carriages too. Furthermore, no violation against Fifth Amendment was found since there is no discrimination between different types/classes within same industry when applying regulations equally across board; hence providing equal protection under laws.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Ayrshire Collieries Corp. et al. v. United States et al., Justice Frankfurter argued that the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) should have been allowed to continue its regulation of railroad rates, as it had done since 1906 without any legal challenges until this case arose in 1946. He believed that Congress intended for the ICC to regulate these rates when they passed legislation creating the commission and giving it broad powers over interstate commerce, including railroads. Furthermore, he disagreed with his colleagues' interpretation of a recent amendment to federal law which they claimed removed coal from ICC's jurisdiction; instead, he interpreted this amendment as merely clarifying existing laws rather than changing them significantly enough to strip away ICC's authority over coal transportation prices.

Opinion written by Justice FMurphy
Decided: Apr 28, 1947
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms