Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Bacon v. The Poconoket

1897 • 168 U.S. 707 • Fuller Court
In the 1897 case of Bacon v. The Poconoket, the U.S Supreme Court addressed a dispute over land ownership in Rhode Island. The plaintiff, Bacon, claimed that he had purchased land from an individual who was allegedly part of the Wampanoag tribe (referred to as "The Poconoket" in court documents). However, it was disputed whether this person had any right to sell tribal lands at all. Furthermore, there were questions about whether or not these lands were actually part of a reservation protected...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1897
Docket: 95
168 U.S. 707
18 S. Ct. 939
42 L. Ed. 1214
1897 U.S. LEXIS 1765
Argued: Nov 03, 1897

Bacon v. The Poconoket

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1897 case of Bacon v. The Poconoket, the U.S Supreme Court addressed a dispute over land ownership in Rhode Island. The plaintiff, Bacon, claimed that he had purchased land from an individual who was allegedly part of the Wampanoag tribe (referred to as "The Poconoket" in court documents). However, it was disputed whether this person had any right to sell tribal lands at all. Furthermore, there were questions about whether or not these lands were actually part of a reservation protected by federal law and thus exempt from such transactions. Ultimately, the Supreme Court ruled against Bacon's claim on two grounds: firstly because they found no evidence that his seller held any authority within their tribe; secondly because even if they did have such authority - which remained unproven - Native American tribes cannot alienate their own reservation lands without explicit Congressional approval.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Bacon v. The Poconoket is not available or was not recorded. This 1897 Supreme Court case involved a dispute over land ownership, with the plaintiff asserting that they had purchased the land from Native Americans who were its rightful owners. However, there are no records indicating any dissenting opinions issued by justices on this particular case.

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms