Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Baltimore & Potomac Railroad Company v. Fifth Baptist Church

• 1882 • 108 U.S. 317 • Waite Court
In Baltimore & Potomac Railroad Company v. Fifth Baptist Church, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether a railroad company could be held liable for damages caused by a train accident. The Fifth Baptist Church of Washington, D.C. had sued the Baltimore & Potomac Railroad Company for damages caused by a train accident that occurred on the company's tracks. The church argued that the company was negligent in failing to provide a safe crossing for pedestrians and that...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1882
Docket: 202
108 U.S. 317
2 S. Ct. 719
27 L. Ed. 739
1883 U.S. LEXIS 1043

Baltimore & Potomac Railroad Company v. Fifth Baptist Church

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Baltimore & Potomac Railroad Company v. Fifth Baptist Church, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether a railroad company could be held liable for damages caused by a train accident. The Fifth Baptist Church of Washington, D.C. had sued the Baltimore & Potomac Railroad Company for damages caused by a train accident that occurred on the company's tracks. The church argued that the company was negligent in failing to provide a safe crossing for pedestrians and that the accident was a direct result of the company's negligence. The Supreme Court held that the railroad company was not liable for the accident. The Court reasoned that the company had taken reasonable steps to provide a safe crossing and that the accident was caused by the negligence of the pedestrians, not the company. The Court also noted that the company had no control over the pedestrians' actions and that the company could not be held liable for the negligence of the pedestrians. The Court concluded that the company was not liable for the accident and dismissed the church's claim.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

Justice Field delivered the dissenting opinion in this case. He argued that a contract between two parties should be enforced, even if it is not beneficial to one of them. In this case, the Fifth Baptist Church had entered into an agreement with the Baltimore & Potomac Railroad Company to purchase land for $3,000 and then lease it back to the railroad company for 99 years at a rate of $100 per year. The church was unable to pay off its debt and sought relief from foreclosure proceedings by arguing that they were misled by false representations made by agents of the railroad company when entering into their agreement. Justice Field disagreed with this argument because he believed that contracts are binding regardless of any misrepresentations or fraud committed during negotiations; thus, he concluded that there was no basis on which to relieve the church from its obligations under their contract with the railroad company.

Opinion written by Justice SJField
Decided: Apr 23, 1883
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms