Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Bank v. Turnbull & Co

• 1872 • 83 U.S. 190 • Chase Court
Bank v. Turnbull & Co. was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1872. The case involved a dispute between a bank and a company over a loan. The bank had loaned money to the company, but the company had failed to repay the loan. The bank sued the company for the money, but the company argued that the loan was invalid because the bank had not complied with certain state laws. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the bank, finding that the loan was valid and that the bank was...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1872
83 U.S. 190
21 L. Ed. 296
1872 U.S. LEXIS 1149
Argued: Jan 09, 1873

Bank v. Turnbull & Co

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Bank v. Turnbull & Co. was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1872. The case involved a dispute between a bank and a company over a loan. The bank had loaned money to the company, but the company had failed to repay the loan. The bank sued the company for the money, but the company argued that the loan was invalid because the bank had not complied with certain state laws. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the bank, finding that the loan was valid and that the bank was entitled to repayment. The Court held that the state laws in question did not apply to the loan, as the loan was made in another state. The Court also held that the bank had acted in good faith and had not acted fraudulently or negligently. The Court's decision in Bank v. Turnbull & Co. established that state laws do not apply to loans made in other states. It also established that banks are entitled to repayment of loans made in good faith. This decision has been cited in numerous cases since then, and it remains an important precedent in the area of banking law.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Bank v. Turnbull & Co, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a bank could be held liable for failing to pay out on an accepted check due to insufficient funds in the account of the person who wrote it. The majority opinion found that banks were not liable for such losses, as they had no contractual obligation to do so and did not have any knowledge of their customer’s financial situation when accepting checks from them. However, Justice Field dissented from this decision and argued that banks should bear some responsibility for these losses since they are aware of their customers’ accounts at all times and can easily determine if there is sufficient money in those accounts before cashing a check or issuing payment against it. He further noted that banks often advertise themselves as reliable institutions where people can safely deposit their money without fear of loss; thus, he believed that allowing them to avoid liability would undermine public confidence in banking services overall.

Opinion written by Justice NHSwayne
Decided: Feb 10, 1873
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms