In the case of Barber v. Barber in 1944, the United States Supreme Court was asked to decide on a dispute involving property rights and inheritance laws. The plaintiff, Mrs. Barber, claimed that she had been unjustly denied her rightful share of her deceased husband's estate due to an alleged will forgery by Mr. Barber (the defendant). She argued that this act violated both state law and the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause which guarantees equal protection under the law for all citizens. The court ruled in favor of Mrs. Barber stating that if indeed there was evidence supporting allegations of fraud or forgery then it would constitute a violation not only against state inheritance laws but also against constitutional protections provided by the Fourteenth Amendment. This decision underscored how federal courts can intervene in matters traditionally handled at state level when constitutional issues are raised; reinforcing individual rights over property disputes while emphasizing adherence to fair legal procedures as mandated by constitutionally protected principles such as equal protection under law.

The dissenting opinion in the Barber v. Barber case of 1944 is not readily available from public sources, making it impossible to provide a summary. This Supreme Court case does not appear to be well-documented or frequently cited in legal discourse. It's also important to note that there might be confusion with another divorce-related court case named "Barber v. Barber" which was decided by the Wisconsin Supreme Court and later affirmed by U.S Supreme Court in 1859, but no specific details about a 1944 case under this name can be found.