Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner Of Social Security v. Sigmon Coal Company, Inc., Et Al.

• 2001 • 534 U.S. 438 • Rehnquist Court
The case of Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security v. Sigmon Coal Company, Inc., et al., 2001 revolved around the interpretation and application of the Black Lung Benefits Act (BLBA). The BLBA was designed to provide benefits to coal miners who were totally disabled due to pneumoconiosis ("black lung disease"). In this case, a miner's widow sought survivor’s benefits after her husband died from a heart attack which she claimed was caused by his black lung disease. However, Sigmon...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 2001
Docket: 00-1307
534 U.S. 438
122 S. Ct. 941
151 L. Ed. 2d 908
2002 U.S. LEXIS 617
Argued: Nov 07, 2001

Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner Of Social Security v. Sigmon Coal Company, Inc., Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The case of Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security v. Sigmon Coal Company, Inc., et al., 2001 revolved around the interpretation and application of the Black Lung Benefits Act (BLBA). The BLBA was designed to provide benefits to coal miners who were totally disabled due to pneumoconiosis ("black lung disease"). In this case, a miner's widow sought survivor’s benefits after her husband died from a heart attack which she claimed was caused by his black lung disease. However, Sigmon Coal Company argued that they should not be held liable for these payments as there wasn't sufficient evidence linking the cause of death directly with black lung disease. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Sigmon Coal Company stating that under the BLBA amendments made in 1981 and 1982, it is necessary for claimants seeking survivor’s benefits to prove that their spouse's death was due to pneumoconiosis or complications arising from it. This ruling clarified how causation must be established under the act and set an important precedent regarding liability for companies under such circumstances.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Company, Inc., Justice Ginsburg argued that the majority's interpretation of the Black Lung Benefits Act was incorrect and unfair to coal miners. She believed that Congress intended for coal companies to be responsible for paying disability benefits to their employees who developed black lung disease as a result of their employment. The majority's decision, she argued, would unfairly shift this burden onto taxpayers by requiring the government to pay these benefits instead. Furthermore, she disagreed with the majority's view that a company could only be held liable if it employed a miner during his or her last year of work in a mine; rather, any company employing a miner at any point should share liability.

Opinion written by Justice CThomas
Decided: Feb 19, 2002
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms