Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Bazemore Et Al. v. Friday Et Al.

• 1985 • 478 U.S. 385 • Burger Court
In Bazemore et al. v. Friday et al., the U.S. Supreme Court addressed allegations of racial discrimination within North Carolina's extension service, an educational agency for farmers and families run by North Carolina State University and A&T State University. The plaintiffs, black employees of the extension service, claimed that they were paid less than their white counterparts due to a dual system that had been in place prior to 1965 which segregated workers based on race with separate...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1985
Docket: 85-93
478 U.S. 385
106 S. Ct. 3000
92 L. Ed. 2d 315
1986 U.S. LEXIS 131
Argued: Apr 22, 1986

Bazemore Et Al. v. Friday Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Bazemore et al. v. Friday et al., the U.S. Supreme Court addressed allegations of racial discrimination within North Carolina's extension service, an educational agency for farmers and families run by North Carolina State University and A&T State University. The plaintiffs, black employees of the extension service, claimed that they were paid less than their white counterparts due to a dual system that had been in place prior to 1965 which segregated workers based on race with separate programs for blacks and whites. Although this system was officially abolished in 1965, salary disparities persisted as no adjustments were made to equalize pay between black and white employees who performed similar work duties. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs stating that each week's paycheck that delivers less pay to a black employee than a similarly situated white employee is a wrong actionable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act regardless if it originated from pre-Title VII discrimination era or not.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Bazemore v. Friday, Justice Brennan argued that the majority's decision failed to properly apply Title VII of the Civil Rights Act in relation to discriminatory practices within North Carolina’s extension service. He contended that even though overt racial segregation had ended, there was still a significant salary disparity between black and white employees due to prior discrimination which remained uncorrected by the employer. According to Brennan, this constituted an ongoing violation of Title VII as it perpetuated past discrimination into present-day effects on salaries. Furthermore, he criticized the majority for not considering statistical evidence demonstrating these disparities as sufficient proof of continued discrimination under Title VII standards set by previous court decisions.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: Jul 01, 1986
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms