Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Mary Bein, And Richard Bein, Her Husband, G. S. Hawkins, And James M'masters, Plaintiffs In Error, v. Mary Heath

1851 • 53 U.S. 168 • Taney Court
Mary Bein and Richard Bein, her husband, G. S. Hawkins and James M'Masters (collectively referred to as the Plaintiffs) brought a case against Mary Heath (the Defendant). The Plaintiffs alleged that they were entitled to certain lands in Illinois which had been granted by Congress under an act of 1820. They argued that their title was superior to any claim made by the Defendant who held a patent from the State of Illinois for part of said land. The Supreme Court found in favor of the Defendant...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taney Court
Term: 1851
53 U.S. 168
13 L. Ed. 939
1851 U.S. LEXIS 647
Argued: Dec 05, 1851

Mary Bein, And Richard Bein, Her Husband, G. S. Hawkins, And James M'masters, Plaintiffs In Error, v. Mary Heath

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Mary Bein and Richard Bein, her husband, G. S. Hawkins and James M'Masters (collectively referred to as the Plaintiffs) brought a case against Mary Heath (the Defendant). The Plaintiffs alleged that they were entitled to certain lands in Illinois which had been granted by Congress under an act of 1820. They argued that their title was superior to any claim made by the Defendant who held a patent from the State of Illinois for part of said land. The Supreme Court found in favor of the Defendant on grounds that she had acquired valid title through purchase from one who claimed it under an earlier grant from Virginia prior to its cession to the United States government; thus making her title paramount over any subsequent grants issued by Congress or other states after such cession occurred.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In this case, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a deed of land that had been executed by Mary Heath in 1837 was valid. The plaintiffs argued that the deed should be declared invalid because it did not comply with certain legal requirements and therefore could not be enforced. However, the majority opinion held that although there were some technical deficiencies in the execution of the deed, these defects did not render it void or unenforceable. The dissenting opinion disagreed with this conclusion and argued that since there were several material irregularities in how the deed was executed, it should have been declared void and thus unenforceable. In particular, they noted that no consideration had been paid for transferring ownership of the property from Mary Heath to her husband Richard Bein; furthermore, neither party had signed or acknowledged their signatures on either side of an attested copy as required by law at time when such deeds were made. As a result, they concluded that due to these irregularities which rendered its execution incomplete and defective under existing laws at time when such deeds are made -the court ought to declare said instrument null & void & consequently incapable of conveying any title whatever

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms