In the case of Benjamin D. Harris v. James Robinson, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a judgment in favor of a plaintiff should be reversed due to an alleged error in the jury instructions given by the trial court judge. The defendant argued that he had been denied his right to have certain facts determined by a jury and that this constituted reversible error on behalf of the trial court judge. The Supreme Court disagreed with this argument and held that it was not necessary for all material facts to be submitted to a jury before rendering its verdict; rather, only those issues which were disputed between parties needed consideration from jurors. Furthermore, they found no evidence indicating any prejudice or harm suffered by either party as result of these instructions being given at trial and thus affirmed their decision in favor of plaintiff Harris

In this case, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a contract between two parties should be enforced. The plaintiff argued that the defendant had agreed to pay him for services rendered and requested that he be compensated accordingly. However, the defendant argued that there was no valid agreement in place because of certain irregularities in how it was formed. The majority opinion held that the contract should not be enforced due to these irregularities; however, Justice McLean dissented from this decision on several grounds. He noted firstly that while some of the formalities required by law were not strictly observed during formation of the contract, they did not affect its validity or enforceability under existing legal precedent at common law or equity courts. Secondly, he pointed out that even if those formalities had been violated as alleged by both parties heretofore mentioned then such violation would only render them liable for damages rather than voiding their entire agreement outright - which is what happened here when enforcement was denied altogether instead of awarding damages where appropriate according to established laws and precedents already set forth previously within courtrooms across America's judicial system since time immemorial up until present day proceedings herein now being discussed before us today inside this very courtroom itself right now at hand!