Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Betterman v. Montana

• 2015 • 578 U.S. 437 • Roberts Court
In the case of Betterman v. Montana, Brandon Thomas Betterman was charged with bail jumping and spent over 14 months in jail awaiting sentencing after pleading guilty. He argued that this delay violated his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. However, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously against him stating that the Sixth Amendment's Speedy Trial Clause does not extend to delays in sentencing. The court reasoned that the primary purpose of this clause is to limit undue and oppressive...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Roberts Court
Term: 2015
Docket: 14-1457
578 U.S. 437
136 S. Ct. 1609
194 L. Ed. 2d 723
2016 U.S. LEXIS 3349
Argued: Mar 28, 2016

Betterman v. Montana

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Questions presented:
SCOTUS Records

14-1457 BETTERMAN V. MONTANA DECISION BELOW: 342 P.3d 971 CERT. GRANTED 12/4/2015 QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Sixth Amendment's Speedy Trial Clause applies to the sentencing phase of a criminal prosecution, protecting a criminal defendant from inordinate delay in final disposition of his case. LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: DA 13-0572

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Betterman v. Montana, Brandon Thomas Betterman was charged with bail jumping and spent over 14 months in jail awaiting sentencing after pleading guilty. He argued that this delay violated his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. However, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously against him stating that the Sixth Amendment's Speedy Trial Clause does not extend to delays in sentencing. The court reasoned that the primary purpose of this clause is to limit undue and oppressive incarceration prior to trial, minimize anxiety associated with public accusation and limit possibilities for impairing defense; none of which applies post-conviction or post-guilty plea when there is no presumption of innocence at stake.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Betterman v. Montana, there was no formal dissenting opinion as the decision by the Supreme Court was unanimous (8-0). The court ruled that constitutional protections against excessive delays in criminal sentencing do not apply once a defendant has been found guilty at trial or pleaded guilty. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote for the court and stated that while it is important to prevent undue delay in sentencing, this protection does not fall under the Sixth Amendment's speedy trial guarantee but rather falls under due process provisions.

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms