Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Board Of Airport Commissioners Of The City Of Los Angeles Et Al. v. Jews For Jesus, Inc., Et Al.

• 1986 • 482 U.S. 569 • Rehnquist Court
In the 1986 case Board of Airport Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that a resolution banning all "First Amendment activities" at Los Angeles International Airport was unconstitutional. The airport had adopted this policy to prevent congestion and maintain orderly movement in its central terminal area, but it was challenged by Alan Howard Snyder, an employee of Jews for Jesus who distributed free religious literature...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 1986
Docket: 86-104
482 U.S. 569
107 S. Ct. 2568
96 L. Ed. 2d 500
1987 U.S. LEXIS 2619
Argued: Mar 03, 1987

Board Of Airport Commissioners Of The City Of Los Angeles Et Al. v. Jews For Jesus, Inc., Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1986 case Board of Airport Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that a resolution banning all "First Amendment activities" at Los Angeles International Airport was unconstitutional. The airport had adopted this policy to prevent congestion and maintain orderly movement in its central terminal area, but it was challenged by Alan Howard Snyder, an employee of Jews for Jesus who distributed free religious literature there. The court held that such a sweeping ban violated freedom of speech as protected under the First Amendment because it covered all manner of expressive activity and did not limit itself to addressing specific problems like congestion or disruption.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Board of Airport Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc., Justice White argued that the majority's decision was too broad and could potentially limit reasonable restrictions on speech in nonpublic forums. He contended that while First Amendment rights are important, they do not supersede all other considerations at a public airport terminal. The resolution center should be able to regulate or ban activities causing congestion or disturbances without violating free speech rights. Furthermore, he believed that an outright ban on "First Amendment activities" was not necessarily unconstitutional if it served significant government interests and left open ample alternative channels for communication.

Opinion written by Justice SDOConnor
Decided: Jun 15, 1987
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms