Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Board Of Education Of Paris Union School District No. 95 Et Al. v. Vail

• 1983 • 466 U.S. 377 • Burger Court
In the 1983 case, Board of Education of Paris Union School District No. 95 et al. v. Vail, the U.S Supreme Court addressed a dispute over whether or not a school district could be held financially responsible for providing special education services to students residing in state-operated children's institutions within its boundaries. The Illinois State Board of Education had ordered the local school district (Paris Union) to provide these services and billed them for it, which they refused to...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1983
Docket: 83-87
466 U.S. 377
104 S. Ct. 2144
80 L. Ed. 2d 377
1984 U.S. LEXIS 64
Argued: Feb 28, 1984

Board Of Education Of Paris Union School District No. 95 Et Al. v. Vail

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1983 case, Board of Education of Paris Union School District No. 95 et al. v. Vail, the U.S Supreme Court addressed a dispute over whether or not a school district could be held financially responsible for providing special education services to students residing in state-operated children's institutions within its boundaries. The Illinois State Board of Education had ordered the local school district (Paris Union) to provide these services and billed them for it, which they refused to pay arguing that such responsibility fell under state jurisdiction as per Illinois law. The case reached the Supreme Court after lower courts sided with Paris Union School District but were reversed by an appellate court ruling in favor of Vail who represented the State Board of Education. Ultimately, however, the U.S Supreme Court declined to hear this case thereby leaving intact an Illinois Appellate Court decision requiring local districts to bear financial responsibility for educating all handicapped children living within their boundaries regardless if they are housed in state-run institutions.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the Board of Education of Paris Union School District No. 95 v. Vail case argued that the majority's decision to uphold a state law requiring daily moments of silence in public schools was flawed, as it violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment by promoting religious practices within educational institutions. The dissenters believed that this ruling blurred the line between church and state, which could potentially lead to government endorsement or coercion towards certain religions over others. They also expressed concerns about potential infringements on students' rights to freedom from religion, arguing that even though participation in silent prayer was voluntary, students might feel pressured into participating due to peer pressure or fear of ostracism. Furthermore, they questioned whether such laws truly served secular purposes as claimed by their proponents since there were already numerous opportunities for silent reflection throughout a typical school day without needing specific legislation mandating it.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: Apr 23, 1984
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms