Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Bonner v. United States

• 1869 • 76 U.S. 156 • Chase Court
Bonner v. United States was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the issue of whether a defendant could be convicted of a crime if the indictment was not found by a grand jury. The case involved a man named William Bonner, who was charged with the crime of counterfeiting. Bonner argued that he could not be convicted of the crime because the indictment was not found by a grand jury. The Supreme Court disagreed and held that a defendant could be convicted of a crime even if the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1869
76 U.S. 156
19 L. Ed. 666
1869 U.S. LEXIS 953
Argued: Feb 23, 1870

Bonner v. United States

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Bonner v. United States was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the issue of whether a defendant could be convicted of a crime if the indictment was not found by a grand jury. The case involved a man named William Bonner, who was charged with the crime of counterfeiting. Bonner argued that he could not be convicted of the crime because the indictment was not found by a grand jury. The Supreme Court disagreed and held that a defendant could be convicted of a crime even if the indictment was not found by a grand jury. The Court reasoned that the Fifth Amendment did not require a grand jury to find an indictment in order for a defendant to be convicted of a crime. The Court also noted that the Sixth Amendment did not require a grand jury to find an indictment in order for a defendant to be convicted of a crime. The Court concluded that a defendant could be convicted of a crime even if the indictment was not found by a grand jury. This ruling established that a defendant could be convicted of a crime without a grand jury finding an indictment.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Bonner v. United States, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a defendant could be convicted of an offense not specified in the indictment against them. The majority opinion held that such convictions were permissible under certain circumstances, while Justice Field dissented from this ruling. He argued that allowing defendants to be convicted of offenses not charged in their indictments would violate due process and deprive them of their right to notice as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment's Grand Jury Clause. Furthermore, he noted that it is essential for criminal proceedings to adhere strictly to statutory requirements so as not to undermine public confidence in judicial decisions or create uncertainty about what constitutes a crime and its punishment. As such, Justice Field concluded that any conviction must rest upon charges made known at trial or else risk violating fundamental principles of justice and fairness enshrined within our Constitution.

Opinion written by Justice DDavis
Decided: Mar 21, 1870
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms