Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Boone County v. Burlington And Missouri River Railroad Company

• 1890 • 139 U.S. 684 • Fuller Court
In the Boone County v. Burlington and Missouri River Railroad Company case of 1890, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Boone County. The dispute arose when Boone County issued bonds to aid in the construction of a railroad by Burlington and Missouri River Railroad Company under an act passed by Nebraska's legislature. However, due to certain irregularities during voting for these bonds' issuance, they were declared void by Nebraska's Supreme Court. Despite this ruling, some bondholders...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1890
Docket: 297
139 U.S. 684
11 S. Ct. 687
35 L. Ed. 319
1891 U.S. LEXIS 2423
Argued: Apr 09, 1891

Boone County v. Burlington And Missouri River Railroad Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the Boone County v. Burlington and Missouri River Railroad Company case of 1890, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Boone County. The dispute arose when Boone County issued bonds to aid in the construction of a railroad by Burlington and Missouri River Railroad Company under an act passed by Nebraska's legislature. However, due to certain irregularities during voting for these bonds' issuance, they were declared void by Nebraska's Supreme Court. Despite this ruling, some bondholders sued for their payment arguing that they had purchased them in good faith without knowledge of any irregularities. The U.S Supreme Court held that while innocent purchasers should generally be protected from losses resulting from government malfeasance or negligence, it was not applicable in this case as there was no legal obligation on part of the county to pay these bonds since they were voided ab initio (from inception). Therefore, even though bondholders may have bought them innocently believing them valid obligations backed by tax revenues as promised initially; once invalidated legally - such promises became unenforceable leaving buyers with no recourse against issuer i.e., Boone County.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Boone County v. Burlington and Missouri River Railroad Company, it was argued that the majority's decision to uphold a tax exemption on certain railroad properties contradicted previous rulings of the court. The dissent contended that this inconsistency undermined public confidence in judicial decisions and created uncertainty around property rights. Furthermore, they believed that granting such exemptions unfairly shifted the burden of taxation onto other taxpayers within the county who did not benefit from these railroads' operations as much as those directly involved with them did. They also expressed concern about potential abuse by corporations seeking similar preferential treatment through lobbying efforts at state legislatures, which could further erode public trust in government institutions if left unchecked.

Opinion written by Justice SBlatchford
Decided: Apr 20, 1891
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms