Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Veterans Of The Abraham Lincoln Brigade v. Subversive Activities Control Board

• 1964 • 380 U.S. 513 • Warren Court
In the 1964 case, Veterans of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade v. Subversive Activities Control Board, the United States Supreme Court upheld a ruling by the Subversive Activities Control Board that required members of certain organizations to register with the government. The Veterans of Abraham Lincoln Brigade was an organization made up primarily of Americans who had fought against fascism in Spain during its civil war in 1936-39. They were ordered to register as a "Communist-action" group under...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1964
Docket: 65
380 U.S. 513
85 S. Ct. 1153
14 L. Ed. 2d 46
1965 U.S. LEXIS 1353
Argued: Dec 09, 1964

Veterans Of The Abraham Lincoln Brigade v. Subversive Activities Control Board

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1964 case, Veterans of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade v. Subversive Activities Control Board, the United States Supreme Court upheld a ruling by the Subversive Activities Control Board that required members of certain organizations to register with the government. The Veterans of Abraham Lincoln Brigade was an organization made up primarily of Americans who had fought against fascism in Spain during its civil war in 1936-39. They were ordered to register as a "Communist-action" group under provisions set forth by Internal Security Act (ISA) due to their alleged ties with Communist Party USA and other communist groups worldwide. The court ruled that this requirement did not violate First Amendment rights because it only required registration and disclosure rather than prohibiting or punishing any particular speech or association directly.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Veterans of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade v. Subversive Activities Control Board, Justice William O. Douglas argued that the majority's decision violated First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and association. He contended that it was unconstitutional to label an organization as "subversive" based on its political beliefs or affiliations, even if those beliefs were unpopular or controversial. Furthermore, he criticized the majority for allowing guilt by association and warned against government overreach in regulating political activity. According to him, such actions could lead down a slippery slope towards totalitarianism where any dissent is suppressed under law.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: Apr 26, 1965
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms