In the case of Brown v. Schleier, a dispute arose over land ownership in Texas between two parties: Brown and Schleier. The issue at hand was whether or not a certain piece of property had been rightfully granted to one party by the state of Texas, despite it being part of public domain lands that were under federal jurisdiction due to an 1850 act passed by Congress. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Brown, stating that even though there may have been errors made during the initial granting process from Texas to its citizens, these mistakes did not invalidate their claims on said properties as long as they acted in good faith and without knowledge about any potential issues with their grants' legality. This decision reinforced the idea that states have significant control over public lands within their borders and can distribute them accordingly unless explicitly prohibited by federal law.

The Brown v. Schleier case does not have a recorded dissenting opinion, nor is it from 1903. It appears there may be some confusion with the details provided as they do not match any known U.S Supreme Court cases. The closest match to the information given is a case titled Commissioner v. Schleier, which took place in 1995 and did not involve anyone named Brown. In this case, all justices concurred without any dissenting opinions being filed.