Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Bryan v. Itasca County, Minnesota

• 1975 • 426 U.S. 373 • Burger Court
In Bryan v. Itasca County, Minnesota, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that state and local governments cannot impose taxes on individuals living on Native American reservations without explicit authorization from Congress. The case began when Russell Bryan, a member of the Chippewa Tribe residing in Itasca County, was taxed for his mobile home by county officials despite it being located within reservation boundaries. He argued this violated federal laws protecting tribal sovereignty and...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1975
Docket: 75-5027
426 U.S. 373
96 S. Ct. 2102
48 L. Ed. 2d 710
1976 U.S. LEXIS 61
Argued: Apr 20, 1976

Bryan v. Itasca County, Minnesota

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Bryan v. Itasca County, Minnesota, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that state and local governments cannot impose taxes on individuals living on Native American reservations without explicit authorization from Congress. The case began when Russell Bryan, a member of the Chippewa Tribe residing in Itasca County, was taxed for his mobile home by county officials despite it being located within reservation boundaries. He argued this violated federal laws protecting tribal sovereignty and self-governance. The court unanimously agreed with Bryan's argument stating that while states have some jurisdiction over activities on reservations as per Public Law 280 (1953), it did not grant them authority to levy taxes there unless specifically authorized by Congress - which had not occurred in this instance. This landmark decision affirmed the principle of tribal sovereignty and clarified limits to state power over Native American tribes; reinforcing their right to govern themselves free from undue external interference.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the Bryan v. Itasca County case, there was no dissenting opinion recorded. The Supreme Court's decision was unanimous in favor of Russell Bryan, a member of the Chippewa Tribe living on a reservation in Minnesota who had been assessed for personal property tax by Itasca County. The court ruled that under Public Law 280 (1953), states did not have authority to impose such taxes on Native Americans living on reservations without express consent from Congress.

Opinion written by Justice WJBrennan
Decided: Jun 14, 1976
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms