Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Buchanan v. Warley

• 1917 • 245 U.S. 60 • White Court
The Buchanan v. Warley case in 1917 was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that addressed racial segregation in residential areas. The case arose when Charles H. Buchanan, a white man, sued William Warley, an African American man who had agreed to buy property from him but later refused because of a Louisville ordinance prohibiting blacks from occupying homes on blocks where the majority were whites and vice versa. The court ruled unanimously against this law as it...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1917
Docket: 33
245 U.S. 60
38 S. Ct. 16
62 L. Ed. 149
1917 U.S. LEXIS 1788
Argued: Apr 10, 1916

Buchanan v. Warley

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Buchanan v. Warley case in 1917 was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that addressed racial segregation in residential areas. The case arose when Charles H. Buchanan, a white man, sued William Warley, an African American man who had agreed to buy property from him but later refused because of a Louisville ordinance prohibiting blacks from occupying homes on blocks where the majority were whites and vice versa. The court ruled unanimously against this law as it interfered with the right to contract which is protected under the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. This ruling marked one of the first instances where racial zoning laws were deemed unconstitutional by federal courts and set important precedents for future civil rights cases.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the Buchanan v. Warley case of 1917, there was no dissenting opinion recorded as the decision was unanimous. The U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Buchanan, declaring that laws segregating neighborhoods by race were unconstitutional because they interfered with property rights protected under the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause. This landmark ruling invalidated racial zoning ordinances and upheld an individual's right to sell property without state interference based on race or color.

Opinion written by Justice WRDay
Decided: Nov 05, 1917
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms