Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Victoria Buckley, Secretary Of State Of Colorado v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc., Et Al.

• 1998 • 525 U.S. 182 • Rehnquist Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Victoria Buckley, Secretary of State of Colorado v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc., et al., 1998 dealt with the issue of petition circulators for ballot initiatives in the state of Colorado. The court ruled that several requirements imposed by Colorado on paid petition circulators were unconstitutional as they violated First Amendment rights to free speech and association. These included a requirement that all circulators be registered voters, wear...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 1998
Docket: 97-930
525 U.S. 182
119 S. Ct. 636
142 L. Ed. 2d 599
1999 U.S. LEXIS 506
Argued: Oct 14, 1998

Victoria Buckley, Secretary Of State Of Colorado v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc., Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Victoria Buckley, Secretary of State of Colorado v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc., et al., 1998 dealt with the issue of petition circulators for ballot initiatives in the state of Colorado. The court ruled that several requirements imposed by Colorado on paid petition circulators were unconstitutional as they violated First Amendment rights to free speech and association. These included a requirement that all circulators be registered voters, wear identification badges while collecting signatures, and disclose their names and addresses publicly when submitting petitions to the secretary of state's office for verification purposes. However, it upheld one provision requiring initiative proponents to file reports disclosing who was paid how much for circulating petitions.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Justice Rehnquist disagreed with the majority's decision to strike down Colorado's requirement that petition circulators be registered voters and wear identification badges. He argued that these requirements were not burdensome restrictions on free speech but rather reasonable regulations intended to maintain integrity in the initiative process. According to him, requiring petition circulators to be registered voters ensured they had a stake in the outcome of initiatives and helped prevent fraud by making it easier for state officials to track them down if necessary. Similarly, he believed that ID badges provided transparency by allowing potential signatories to know who was soliciting their signatures. In his view, these measures did not significantly impede political expression but instead promoted an informed electorate and protected against corruption.

Opinion written by Justice RBGinsburg
Decided: Jan 12, 1999
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms