Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Bugajewitz v. Adams, United States Immigration Inspector

• 1912 • 228 U.S. 585 • White Court
In the case of Bugajewitz v. Adams, United States Immigration Inspector in 1912, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on an immigration issue involving a woman from Russia who was denied entry into the United States due to her pregnancy out of wedlock. The woman, Anna Bugajewitz, arrived at Ellis Island and was deemed likely to become a public charge because she was unmarried and pregnant. She appealed this decision but it was upheld by both Secretary of Commerce and Labor Charles Nagel as well as...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1912
Docket: 239
228 U.S. 585
33 S. Ct. 607
57 L. Ed. 978
1913 U.S. LEXIS 2400

Bugajewitz v. Adams, United States Immigration Inspector

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Bugajewitz v. Adams, United States Immigration Inspector in 1912, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on an immigration issue involving a woman from Russia who was denied entry into the United States due to her pregnancy out of wedlock. The woman, Anna Bugajewitz, arrived at Ellis Island and was deemed likely to become a public charge because she was unmarried and pregnant. She appealed this decision but it was upheld by both Secretary of Commerce and Labor Charles Nagel as well as federal courts. The Supreme Court affirmed these decisions with Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes delivering the opinion for a unanimous court that under existing immigration laws at that time which excluded persons "likely to become a public charge," it is within discretion of authorities whether or not such person would be admitted or deported based on their circumstances upon arrival.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Bugajewitz v. Adams, Justice Holmes disagreed with the majority's interpretation of the Immigration Act of 1907. He argued that it was not intended to exclude immigrants merely because they had a disease at some point in their past, but rather those who were currently suffering from a "loathsome or dangerous contagious disease" at the time of inspection upon arrival in America. In this case, he believed there was no evidence that Mrs. Bugajewitz still suffered from trachoma when she arrived in New York and therefore should not have been excluded based on her previous affliction alone.

Opinion written by Justice OWHolmes
Decided: May 12, 1913
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms