Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Building And Construction Trades Council Of The Metropolitan District v. Associated Builders And Contractors Of Massachusetts/rhode Island, Inc., Et Al.

• 1992 • 507 U.S. 218 • Rehnquist Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Building and Construction Trades Council of the Metropolitan District v. Associated Builders and Contractors of Massachusetts/Rhode Island, Inc., et al., 1992, revolved around a dispute over whether a city could require that all construction projects funded in part by the city must adhere to an agreement favoring union labor. The Boston Redevelopment Authority (BRA) had mandated that developers receiving financial assistance from the city or building on BRA-owned...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 1992
Docket: 91-261
507 U.S. 218
113 S. Ct. 1190
122 L. Ed. 2d 565
1993 U.S. LEXIS 1948
Argued: Dec 09, 1992

Building And Construction Trades Council Of The Metropolitan District v. Associated Builders And Contractors Of Massachusetts/rhode Island, Inc., Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Building and Construction Trades Council of the Metropolitan District v. Associated Builders and Contractors of Massachusetts/Rhode Island, Inc., et al., 1992, revolved around a dispute over whether a city could require that all construction projects funded in part by the city must adhere to an agreement favoring union labor. The Boston Redevelopment Authority (BRA) had mandated that developers receiving financial assistance from the city or building on BRA-owned land needed to abide by such an agreement. However, this was challenged by non-union contractors who argued it violated federal law prohibiting states from regulating areas reserved for federal control - specifically labor relations. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the BRA, stating that while cities cannot regulate private sector labor management relations directly, they can set terms tied to their proprietary interests as market participants without violating federal law. This meant when acting as proprietors rather than regulators (i.e., spending public money or leasing public land), cities could insist upon labor agreements even if these favored unions.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Building and Construction Trades Council of the Metropolitan District v. Associated Builders and Contractors of Massachusetts/Rhode Island, Inc., Justice Scalia argued that Boston's executive order mandating labor agreements on public construction projects did not violate federal law. He contended that Congress had not intended to preclude state or local governments from imposing such requirements when acting as market participants rather than regulators. The majority’s interpretation, he suggested, would lead to absurd results by preventing government entities from making ordinary business decisions about contract terms in a variety of contexts beyond just construction projects. Furthermore, he disagreed with the majority's view that Boston was regulating labor relations; instead, it was merely setting conditions under which it would permit work on its own property.

Opinion written by Justice HABlackmun
Decided: Mar 08, 1993
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms