Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Burton v. West Jersey Ferry Company

• 1884 • 114 U.S. 474 • Waite Court
In Burton v. West Jersey Ferry Company, the United States Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a ferry company was liable for damages caused by a collision between two of its vessels. The plaintiff, Burton, was a passenger on one of the vessels and was injured in the collision. The defendant, West Jersey Ferry Company, argued that it was not liable for the damages because the collision was caused by the negligence of the captain of the other vessel. The Supreme Court held that the ferry...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1884
Docket: 242
114 U.S. 474
5 S. Ct. 960
29 L. Ed. 215
1885 U.S. LEXIS 1783
Argued: Apr 09, 1885

Burton v. West Jersey Ferry Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Burton v. West Jersey Ferry Company, the United States Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a ferry company was liable for damages caused by a collision between two of its vessels. The plaintiff, Burton, was a passenger on one of the vessels and was injured in the collision. The defendant, West Jersey Ferry Company, argued that it was not liable for the damages because the collision was caused by the negligence of the captain of the other vessel. The Supreme Court held that the ferry company was liable for the damages caused by the collision. The Court reasoned that the ferry company was responsible for the negligence of its employees, and that the captain of the other vessel was an employee of the ferry company. The Court also noted that the ferry company had a duty to exercise reasonable care in the operation of its vessels, and that it had failed to do so in this case. The Court concluded that the ferry company was liable for the damages caused by the collision and ordered it to pay the plaintiff for his injuries. This case established the principle that employers are responsible for the negligence of their employees, and that they must exercise reasonable care in the operation of their vessels.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

Justice Field delivered the dissenting opinion in Burton v. West Jersey Ferry Company, arguing that the majority's decision was contrary to established precedent and would lead to an unjust result. He argued that under prior decisions of the Supreme Court, a contract could not be voided for fraud unless it had been induced by false representations made directly or indirectly by one party to another. In this case, there were no such misrepresentations; instead, both parties relied on their own independent investigations into the facts before entering into their agreement. As such, Justice Field concluded that even if some of those facts turned out to be incorrect or incomplete after-the-fact, they did not constitute grounds for voiding what was otherwise a valid contract between two competent parties who acted in good faith at all times.

Opinion written by Justice JHarlan(1)
Decided: Apr 20, 1885
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms