Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Bus & Transport Securities Corp. v. Helvering, Commissioner Of Internal Revenue

• 1935 • 296 U.S. 391 • Hughes Court
In the case of Bus & Transport Securities Corp. v. Helvering, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1935, the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a corporation's distribution to its shareholders constituted taxable income or return on capital investment. The court ruled in favor of Helvering and held that such distributions were indeed taxable income under Section 115(a) and (g) of the Revenue Act of 1928. This decision was based on their interpretation that these sections did not...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1935
Docket: 490
296 U.S. 391
56 S. Ct. 277
80 L. Ed. 292
1935 U.S. LEXIS 587
Argued: Nov 20, 1935

Bus & Transport Securities Corp. v. Helvering, Commissioner Of Internal Revenue

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Bus & Transport Securities Corp. v. Helvering, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1935, the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a corporation's distribution to its shareholders constituted taxable income or return on capital investment. The court ruled in favor of Helvering and held that such distributions were indeed taxable income under Section 115(a) and (g) of the Revenue Act of 1928. This decision was based on their interpretation that these sections did not distinguish between earnings accumulated before or after February 28th, 1913 (the effective date for federal income tax). Therefore, all corporate profits distributed as dividends should be considered part of gross income unless explicitly exempted by law.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Bus & Transport Securities Corp. v. Helvering, Justice Stone argued that the majority's interpretation of Section 77B of the Bankruptcy Act was incorrect and overly broad. He contended that this section should not be applied to corporations in receivership unless they were also insolvent or bankrupt, as it would otherwise allow solvent companies to evade their tax obligations by entering into voluntary receiverships. Furthermore, he disagreed with the majority's view that a corporation could only be considered "insolvent" if its liabilities exceeded its assets at fair market value rather than book value; he believed this approach ignored economic realities and unfairly penalized creditors who had relied on book values when extending credit. Finally, Justice Stone criticized the majority for failing to consider whether Congress intended Section 77B to apply in such circumstances.

Opinion written by Justice JCMcReynolds
Decided: Dec 16, 1935
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms