Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Amalgamated Association Of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees Of America, Division 998, Et Al. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board

• 1950 • 340 U.S. 383 • Vinson Court
In the 1950 case of Amalgamated Association of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America, Division 998, et al. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Wisconsin Employment Relations Board (WERB). The dispute arose when a union representing Milwaukee's public transit workers went on strike and WERB issued an order to cease all strikes and picketing activities. The union argued that this violated their First Amendment rights to free...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Vinson Court
Term: 1950
Docket: 329
340 U.S. 383
71 S. Ct. 359
95 L. Ed. 2d 364
1951 U.S. LEXIS 2426
Argued: Jan 09, 1951

Amalgamated Association Of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees Of America, Division 998, Et Al. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1950 case of Amalgamated Association of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America, Division 998, et al. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Wisconsin Employment Relations Board (WERB). The dispute arose when a union representing Milwaukee's public transit workers went on strike and WERB issued an order to cease all strikes and picketing activities. The union argued that this violated their First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly. However, the Supreme Court upheld WERB's decision stating that states have a legitimate interest in maintaining peace and order during labor disputes which can justify restrictions on certain forms of protest such as strikes or pickets.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for the case of Amalgamated Association of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America, Division 998, et al. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board (1950), Justice Black argued that the majority's decision was a departure from established principles governing labor disputes and collective bargaining rights under federal law. He contended that by upholding state authority to prohibit peaceful picketing aimed at persuading customers not to patronize a business involved in a labor dispute, the Court had effectively sanctioned state interference with federally protected union activities. Furthermore, he expressed concern about potential implications on free speech rights as well as interstate commerce regulation if states were allowed to restrict such forms of protest and persuasion commonly used by unions during labor disputes.

Opinion written by Justice FMVinson
Decided: Feb 26, 1951
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms