Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Amalgamated Association Of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees Of America, Division 998, Et Al. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board Et Al.

• 1950 • 340 U.S. 416 • Vinson Court
In the 1950 case of Amalgamated Association of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America, Division 998, et al. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board et al., the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Wisconsin Employment Relations Board (WERB). The dispute arose when a labor union called for a strike against The Milwaukee Electric Railway and Light Company after negotiations over wage increases failed. WERB ordered an end to the strike as it was deemed detrimental to public...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Vinson Court
Term: 1950
Docket: 330
340 U.S. 416
71 S. Ct. 373
95 L. Ed. 2d 389
1951 U.S. LEXIS 2427
Argued: Jan 09, 1951

Amalgamated Association Of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees Of America, Division 998, Et Al. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1950 case of Amalgamated Association of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America, Division 998, et al. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board et al., the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Wisconsin Employment Relations Board (WERB). The dispute arose when a labor union called for a strike against The Milwaukee Electric Railway and Light Company after negotiations over wage increases failed. WERB ordered an end to the strike as it was deemed detrimental to public welfare due to disruption in transportation services. When taken to court by the union claiming that this order violated their rights under federal law, both state courts and ultimately Supreme Court upheld WERB's decision stating that states have authority over local matters such as these unless explicitly overridden by Congress.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for the case of Amalgamated Association of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America, Division 998, et al. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board et al., Justice Black disagreed with the majority's decision to uphold a state law that prohibited public employees from striking. He argued that this ruling was inconsistent with previous decisions which recognized workers' rights to strike as part of their freedom to associate and bargain collectively under the First Amendment. Furthermore, he contended that by denying these employees their right to strike, they were being denied an essential tool in negotiating fair wages and working conditions - effectively undermining their bargaining power against employers who could exploit this imbalance in power relations. In his view, such a prohibition on strikes would only serve to exacerbate labor disputes rather than resolve them peacefully through negotiation and compromise.

Opinion written by Justice FMVinson
Decided: Feb 26, 1951
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms