Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Butler v. Michigan

• 1956 • 352 U.S. 380 • Warren Court
In the case of Butler v. Michigan, 1956, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously struck down a Michigan law that made it a criminal offense to sell literature deemed harmful to minors. The plaintiff was convicted under this law for selling an adult book which contained explicit content not suitable for children. However, he argued that his constitutional rights were violated as the law infringed upon adults' right to access such material just because it could be harmful to minors if read by...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1956
Docket: 16
352 U.S. 380
77 S. Ct. 524
1 L. Ed. 2d 412
1957 U.S. LEXIS 1252
Argued: Oct 16, 1956

Butler v. Michigan

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Butler v. Michigan, 1956, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously struck down a Michigan law that made it a criminal offense to sell literature deemed harmful to minors. The plaintiff was convicted under this law for selling an adult book which contained explicit content not suitable for children. However, he argued that his constitutional rights were violated as the law infringed upon adults' right to access such material just because it could be harmful to minors if read by them. The court ruled in favor of Butler stating that protecting juveniles from potentially harmful materials did not justify reducing adult consumption of those same materials to what is fit for children. Justice Felix Frankfurter wrote in his opinion: "Surely this is to burn the house down to roast the pig." This ruling emphasized First Amendment protections and set important precedent regarding censorship laws and their potential overreach into protected freedoms.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Butler v. Michigan, there was no dissenting opinion recorded as the decision was unanimous. The Supreme Court ruled 9-0 in favor of Butler, striking down a Michigan law that made it a misdemeanor to sell literature containing "obscene, immoral, lewd or lascivious language" on grounds that it violated the First Amendment's protection of freedom of speech. Justice Felix Frankfurter delivered the court's opinion stating that this law went beyond what is constitutionally permissible as it sought to protect minors by reducing adults' access to such materials to only what is suitable for children.

Opinion written by Justice FFrankfurter
Decided: Feb 25, 1957
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms