Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Califano, Secretary Of Health, Education, And Welfare v. Westcott Et Al.

• 1978 • 443 U.S. 76 • Burger Court
In the case of Califano v. Westcott, 1978, the US Supreme Court ruled that a provision in the Social Security Act was unconstitutional because it discriminated on the basis of gender. The contested provision provided benefits to families with dependent children who had been deprived of parental support due to the unemployment of their father but did not provide for families where mothers were unemployed. This violated equal protection principles under Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause as...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1978
Docket: 78-437
443 U.S. 76
99 S. Ct. 2655
61 L. Ed. 2d 382
1979 U.S. LEXIS 138
Argued: Apr 16, 1979

Califano, Secretary Of Health, Education, And Welfare v. Westcott Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Califano v. Westcott, 1978, the US Supreme Court ruled that a provision in the Social Security Act was unconstitutional because it discriminated on the basis of gender. The contested provision provided benefits to families with dependent children who had been deprived of parental support due to the unemployment of their father but did not provide for families where mothers were unemployed. This violated equal protection principles under Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause as interpreted by previous court decisions which prohibit federal government from engaging in sex-based discrimination unless it serves an important governmental objective and is substantially related to achieving that objective. In this case, no such substantial relationship existed between gender-based distinction and any important governmental objectives (like administrative convenience or reflecting traditional views about family roles). Therefore, rather than invalidating entire program or denying relief to plaintiffs (who sought extension rather than termination), court ordered Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare (HEW) - Joseph A Califano Jr., at time - to extend benefits until Congress could amend law.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Califano v. Westcott, Justice Rehnquist disagreed with the majority's view that Section 407 of the Social Security Act was unconstitutional due to gender discrimination. He argued that this provision, which only provided benefits to families where a father was unemployed but not when a mother was unemployed, did not violate equal protection principles because it reflected Congress' reasonable attempt to address societal issues based on statistical realities at that time - namely, men were more likely than women to be primary wage earners in families and their unemployment would therefore have greater financial impact on family welfare. Furthermore, he contended that courts should defer to legislative judgment unless there is clear evidence of irrationality or arbitrariness in such classifications made by Congress.

Opinion written by Justice HABlackmun
Decided: Jun 25, 1979
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms