Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

California Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver Portland Cement Co. Et Al.

• 1934 • 295 U.S. 142 • Hughes Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case California Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver Portland Cement Co., et al., in 1934, revolved around the rights to use water from the Rogue River in Oregon for power generation purposes. The dispute was between California Oregon Power Company (COPCO) and Beaver Portland Cement Company over who had priority of right to use the river's waters under federal law - COPCO claimed it based on a 1905 Act while Beaver asserted its claim through an earlier state-granted permit but with...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1934
Docket: 612
295 U.S. 142
55 S. Ct. 725
79 L. Ed. 1356
1935 U.S. LEXIS 1106
Argued: Apr 05, 1935

California Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver Portland Cement Co. Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case California Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver Portland Cement Co., et al., in 1934, revolved around the rights to use water from the Rogue River in Oregon for power generation purposes. The dispute was between California Oregon Power Company (COPCO) and Beaver Portland Cement Company over who had priority of right to use the river's waters under federal law - COPCO claimed it based on a 1905 Act while Beaver asserted its claim through an earlier state-granted permit but with later development than COPCO’s project. The court ruled that although both parties were entitled to use the water, precedence should be given according to who put it into beneficial use first rather than who obtained legal permission first – thus favoring COPCO as they developed their hydroelectric plant before Beaver began using water for cement production despite having an earlier permit date. This decision established important precedent regarding appropriation doctrine or "first in time, first in right" principle which prioritizes actual usage over mere legal entitlements when dealing with natural resources like water.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for California Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver Portland Cement Co., Justice McReynolds disagreed with the majority's interpretation of "navigable waters" and its application to water rights, arguing that it was too broad and inconsistent with previous rulings. He contended that a stream should only be considered navigable if it is used or can be made usable for trade or travel in its ordinary condition, not when artificial aids are required to make it so. In his view, this would mean that Rogue River (the river at issue in this case) was non-navigable above Big Butte Creek because there were no historical records indicating commercial navigation above this point without substantial artificial aid such as dams or locks. Therefore, he believed the plaintiff had valid riparian rights under state law which allowed them to divert water from the river for their own use without federal interference.

Opinion written by Justice GSutherland
Decided: Apr 29, 1935
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms