Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Cameron Et Al. v. Johnson, Governor Of Mississippi, Et Al.

• 1964 • 381 U.S. 741 • Warren Court
The Cameron et al. v. Johnson, Governor of Mississippi, et al., 1964 case was a significant U.S Supreme Court ruling that upheld the constitutionality of a Mississippi anti-picketing law. The plaintiffs were civil rights activists who had been arrested for picketing in violation of this law and argued that it infringed upon their First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly. However, the court ruled against them on grounds that states have the right to regulate conduct such as picketing...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1964
Docket: 587 M
381 U.S. 741
85 S. Ct. 1751
14 L. Ed. 2d 715
1965 U.S. LEXIS 975

Cameron Et Al. v. Johnson, Governor Of Mississippi, Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Cameron et al. v. Johnson, Governor of Mississippi, et al., 1964 case was a significant U.S Supreme Court ruling that upheld the constitutionality of a Mississippi anti-picketing law. The plaintiffs were civil rights activists who had been arrested for picketing in violation of this law and argued that it infringed upon their First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly. However, the court ruled against them on grounds that states have the right to regulate conduct such as picketing if it threatens public order or obstructs access to premises - even if such conduct is expressive in nature and thus potentially protected by the First Amendment. This decision underscored how concerns about maintaining public order can sometimes override individual liberties.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Cameron et al. v. Johnson, Governor of Mississippi, et al., Justice William O. Douglas argued that the anti-picketing law in question was unconstitutional because it violated First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly. He contended that peaceful picketing is a form of expression protected by the Constitution, regardless of whether its message is popular or not. Furthermore, he criticized the majority's reliance on local authorities' interpretation of "breach of peace," arguing this could easily be manipulated to suppress unpopular views or minority voices under vague definitions and subjective judgment calls about what constitutes a disturbance or threat to public order.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: Jun 07, 1965
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms