Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Local 60, United Brotherhood Of Carpenters And Joiners Of America, Afl-cio, Et Al. v. National Labor Relations Board

• 1960 • 365 U.S. 651 • Warren Court
In the 1960 case Local 60, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL-CIO v. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the Supreme Court ruled in favor of NLRB. The dispute arose when a local union was accused by an employer for violating section 8(b)(4)(A) of the National Labor Relations Act - which prohibits unions from coercing employers to force their employees into joining a union - through picketing activities aimed at compelling his company to sign an agreement with them....Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1960
Docket: 68
365 U.S. 651
81 S. Ct. 875
6 L. Ed. 2d 1
1961 U.S. LEXIS 2029
Argued: Feb 28, 1961

Local 60, United Brotherhood Of Carpenters And Joiners Of America, Afl-cio, Et Al. v. National Labor Relations Board

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1960 case Local 60, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL-CIO v. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the Supreme Court ruled in favor of NLRB. The dispute arose when a local union was accused by an employer for violating section 8(b)(4)(A) of the National Labor Relations Act - which prohibits unions from coercing employers to force their employees into joining a union - through picketing activities aimed at compelling his company to sign an agreement with them. The Union argued that they were not trying to coerce any individual employee but rather seeking recognition from the employer as part of collective bargaining rights. However, based on evidence presented, it was clear that their actions had coerced some employees into joining their ranks against their wills and thus violated said provision. Therefore, despite arguments about First Amendment rights being infringed upon due to restrictions on picketing activity imposed by this ruling, the court upheld NLRB's decision stating that such conduct fell within exceptions allowed under law for regulating labor disputes.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for this case, Justice Frankfurter argued that the majority's decision to uphold a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruling against Local 60 was based on an overly broad interpretation of labor law. He contended that while it is true that unions should not be allowed to engage in unfair practices, such as coercing employers into hiring only union members or forcing employees to join their ranks, there are limits to what can be considered coercion under federal law. In his view, the NLRB had overstepped its bounds by finding Local 60 guilty of violating these provisions simply because they sought and obtained a contract clause requiring contractors who hired non-union workers to pay them at union rates. This action did not amount to coercion but rather represented legitimate collective bargaining activity aimed at protecting union wages and working conditions from being undercut by non-union competition.

Opinion written by Justice WODouglas
Decided: Apr 17, 1961
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms